This is the first post in what will become a regular feature on this blog: A look back at previous posts that are related to newly-discovered content.
Further support for prediction markets.
Trading on the Wisdom of Crowds (Wall Street Journal)
How accurate are prediction markets in U.S. elections? (Yahoo! Answers)
Earlier: How to predict the future
---
What are your odds of dying from a given injury?
Odds of Dying (National Safety Council)
Earlier: Suicide hotlines
---
Economists, on the question of organ markets as a solution to the organ donor shortage.
Human Organs for Sale, Legally, in ... Which Country? (Freakonomics Blog)
Financial Compensation for Organ Donors is Working (Marginal Revolution)
Earlier: Kidneys for sale?
Showing posts with label Wall Street Journal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wall Street Journal. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 29
Thursday, November 22
Kidneys for sale?
Kidney Shortage Inspires A Radical Idea: Organ Sales (Wall Street Journal)
Flesh Trade (New York Times Magazine)
Two great articles about the lack of kidneys available for transplant in the U.S., and the potential solution of a regulated organ market. While I haven't completely made up my mind about organ markets, I am definitely a big fan of two other ideas: paired exchange (graphical explanation), and changing to an opt-out system of organ donation.
One of the main arguments against a market for organs is that the poor might feel unduly pressured into selling a kidney. Stephen J. Dubner argues the opposite, that the poor would actually benefit the most from a kidney market.
Flesh Trade (New York Times Magazine)
Two great articles about the lack of kidneys available for transplant in the U.S., and the potential solution of a regulated organ market. While I haven't completely made up my mind about organ markets, I am definitely a big fan of two other ideas: paired exchange (graphical explanation), and changing to an opt-out system of organ donation.
One of the main arguments against a market for organs is that the poor might feel unduly pressured into selling a kidney. Stephen J. Dubner argues the opposite, that the poor would actually benefit the most from a kidney market.
Labels:
economics,
Freakonomics,
health,
New York Times,
Wall Street Journal
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
